|
Also reading is easy and supported by the author including the right proportion of interesting and spicy facts. Shells and other marine fossils were often found side-by-side with tongue stones in rocks. "Dragged onto shore and clubbed to death, the shark, a great white, tipped the scales at 3,500 Florentine pounds -- about 2,800 pounds in today's measure. Cutler gives us the following quotation from the introduction to the Prodromus which must give us a sense of his feeling on entry to a new realm of research: "I saw that I was wandering in the kind of labyrinth where the nearer one comes to the exit, the greater the circles in which one walks." (page 208)"To Steno separating answerable from unanswerable questions was the key to scientific investigation." (page 113)Ultimately, Steno's achievement in De solido was not just that he proposed a new, and correct, theory of fossils. In their wigs and brocade jacket, Ferdinando and Leopoldo's experimenters dissolved pearls in acid and used plates of solid gold to prove the penetrating force of magnetism, all to the delight of the court." (Page 51)"The Cimento was breaking up. He did not see what purpose they served.
He began to practice asceticism and this rigorous livestyle may have harmed his health. It can be either a tool for education or pleasure. He spent almost six months in Germany, in interval of time about which almost nothing is known." (page 125)"The veins came after the rocks, they were not from "the beginning of things." Page 143De Solido Intra Solidum Naturaliter Contento Dissertationis ProdromusProdromus to a Dissertation on Solids Naturally Enclosed in SolidsThe Prodromus was intended as an outline or extended abstract of a larger report which was either lost or never finished. "He was, first, an anatomist of spectacular skill at a time when the inner workings of the human body were still very much terra incognita. The emphasis was on experimentation and inductive reason rather that deduction and Cartesian science.Accademia del Cimento (Florence)".Florence, indeed all of Europe, was in a state of transition. After boiling the heart to soften it and peeling away its outer membranes, Steno found that its walls were fibrous like a muscle.
Review of The Seashell on the Mountaintop: How Nicolaus Steno (1638-1686) solved an ancient mystery and created a science of the earth By Alan CutlerA quotation dominated reviewby Walter H. Additionally this book is enjoyable to read. Starting out in Hanover, Steno was responsible for western Germany, Denmark, and Norway. If the "indisputable evidences" of Descartes and his followers were errors "which in an hour or so I can get a ten-year-old to demonstrate," said Steno, "what certainty can I then have about other subtleties of which they boast." Page 88In Florence a research group, the first of its kind, was being set up by the Medici family. Steno go on to study the more general problem of fossils. The dispute had always been whether this heart was a muscular pump, forcing blood into the blood vessels during its contractions, or if it was a furnace, generating the body's heat and causing the blood inside it to violently expand and rush into the vessels." (page 87)"Soon after reading the book, Steno and a friend dissected an ox heart to see how it squared with Descartes's contentions.
It was an awkward, in-between age--reborn, reformed, but not yet enlightened." (Page 6)"In setting up their hothouse for the new experimental philosophy the Medici brothers were following an old family tradition. In addition quotations attributed to Steno are emboldened."Steno's changed our place in time. Borelli had no patience with his intellectual inferiors, and was suspicious of his few equals. Wielding power off and on for nearly four centuries, the Medici clan had always been patrons t the greatest artists and philosophers in Florence. The Age of the Enlightenment , on the other hand, was barely on the horizon. Probably few people had seen the inside of a shark's mouth and lived to tell the tale." Page 57" It was clear to Steno that the tongue-stone question was really only a special case of the general problem of fossil seashells and other "marine bodies" dug from the earth in places far from the sea. The convulsions of the Protestant Reformation had mostly subsided.
Nor was it simply that he presented a new and correct interpretation of rock strata. Some years before, he and Viviani had been the first to measure the speed of sound: now they were barely on speaking terms." Page 81Tongue Stones, Glossopetrae, sharks teeth and Fossils"Today the word (fossils) is generally used for the preserved remains of ancient plant or animal life - bones, teeth, shells, wood, and so on --- found in rock strata, but it formerly included all distinctive stones, crystals, gems, and mineral ores that one might dig up." (page 31)The same year that Steno arrived at the Cimento a strange event happened. Corpses could be had from the hospital or gallows with a wave of the grand duke's hand. Steno's contributions are so central to our science, and it is true that he should be considered the Father of the Geosciences. This is a real contribution on Cutler's part, but difficult to review adequately because it is a veritable who's who of early science. "This book is aimed at general readers and is not intended to be a scholarly work. The Renaissance had pretty much run it course. If he had never been had the chance to see with his own eyes layers of rock packed with fossilized shells, or strata raised and contorted into mountains, he certainly saw them then." (page 44)"After excursions to the hill-top city of Volterra and the mines on the island of Elba, he wrote enthusiastically to Magalotti, "Everything I saw confirmed my opinion or rather the opinion of the Ancients which I defended in my last treatise" regarding "the origin of mussels, shellfish, and glossopterae found in mountains." (Page 104)"He traveled for twenty months, covering nearly four thousand miles, looping through not only Italy, but the Swiss and Austrian Alps, passing through Vienna, and meandering as far a field as northern Hungary." (page 125)"He had seen the famous Mount Vesuvius in the south of Italy, in the Alps he had seen high peaks and fantastically contorted strata, in the famous mines of Germany and Hungary he seen rich deposits of minerals.
It removed us from the center of the standard Biblical narrative and gave our world a new history. It was that he drew up a blueprint for entirely new scientific approach to nature, one that opened up the dimension of time. And should one desire a particular kind of beast not already on hand, His Serene Highness would dispatch hunters or have his agents abroad obtain specimens." (page 51)"The Cimento was unique. To the dismay of Leibniz a friend in Germany, Steno had essentially turned his back on science. Niccolo Machiavelli had dedicated the Prince to a Medici patriarch, Lorenzo the Magnificent." (Pages 49-50)"For someone of Steno's interests it was close to paradise. The court menagerie supplied a wonderful variety of exotic animals to dissect. Please read the spicy parts about Woodward, they are worth the price of the book alone.ConclusionsCutler has done an extraordinary service to the geosciences.
For this reason I have not included end notes or compiled an exhaustive reference list. Under Leopoldo's protection, Borelli had just published a treatise on the forbidden Galilean astronomy that in some ways anticipated Newton. But before Rondelet examined his French specimens, there were not better alternatives. He saw also that the fibers were arranged in such a way that by shortening they would squeeze the heart precisely as it would normally contract to force blood into the arteries--just like a pump. As a young man, he dazzled the scientific world with a string of anatomical discoveries." (Page 2)"Artists, he said, often observed the body more accurately than did scientists." (Page 93)"No doubt," he added, "hidden among what I myself have discovered,: there were things "simpler and more obvious than what I have seen." (page 93)"What is most evident receives the least attention." (Page 93)To Steno, separating answerable from unanswerable questions was the key to scientific investigation. Stratgraphic Principles: Three Principles1) Superposition2) Original Horizontality3) Lateral Continuity,and one Mineralogic Principle: Law of the Constancy of Interfacial Angles.My hope would be that Cutler in a future edition of this work can bolster his treatment of the Law of the Constancy of Interfacial Angles.Live as a Priest and Bishop (1675-1686)Soon afterwards Steno devotes his live to God as a priest.
The answer to the question lay in understanding how all of these bodies, not just tongue stones, came to be found there. When Descartes proposed his "method of doubts," it was because he believed, like Bacon, that it was the path to certainty. Principles that are so simple and lucid that today we think they must have been obvious except that no one before Steno had exposed them. But first we are given a background into how Steno learned science as he understood it.
Many were missing, having been cut out on the beach during the excitement of its capture, but hundreds remained. Each jaw held thirteen rows of teeth. (page 113-114)"Armed with his new science, Steno was emboldened to delve deep into the past, to explore a new history of the world "not dealt with by historians and writers on things of nature." (Page 114)Out of the Prodromus the following principles remain with us today. Upon death at 48 years he had almost no worldly possessions. This was a shock, Steno said, because up to that point he had held Descartes to be "infallible." (Page 87-88)"His Faith in Cartesian science was utterly destroyed.
PierceThis text is both historical and biographical, focusing mainly on Steno's geologic discoveries regarding fossils and fossilization. It was as much a reaction against the radical skepticism prevailing in some quarters as it was against the dogmatic certainties of the Scholastics. "Glossopetrae did not actually look much like snake fangs, nor did they look much like woodpecker's tongues, another hypothesis. The time encompassed by this new history expanded from a mere six thousand years to nearly five billion. Of course we always want more, and in a second edition or perhaps in an expanded scholarly work, I would like to see a schematic time line, and more on the Law of Constancy of Interfacial Angles (perhaps it is not available). Cutler views Steno's chief achievement as simply: "He showed that the earth had a history, revealed in its own rocks." (page 201) The text is also an important contribution to the history of Science and does an excellent job of putting Steno's contributions into the context of the development of science during the seventeenth century. And that meant studying not only the fossils themselves, but the places where they occurred and the materials in which they were embedded." (page 59)"The problem, then, that faced Steno was not that there was no explanation for seashells and tongue stones inside rocks. (page 103)Cartesian Thought"The Scientific Revolution had seemed to offer an antidote to the confusion.
We need to thank Cutler for making so much of this accessible. He is sent to Germany to serve the Catholic Church as a Bishop. Steno noted that the inner rows were soft and half-buried in the gums. Most of the quotations from Steno's geological work." (page 208) In spite Cutler's disclaimer the book contributes mightily to our knowledge of Steno.Below the reviewer has italicized text that is quoted from Cutler's book. The following partial list gives some idea of the rich biographical context of the book: Bartholin, Descartes, van Gorp, Redi, Kircher, Borelli, Spinoza, Avicenna, Lister, Boyle, Newton, Hooke, Ray, Leibniz, Woodward, Reaumur, Ussher, Boulanger, Voltaire, Thomas Jefferson, Arduino, and Goethe.What I enjoyed most about this book is that Cutler has attempted to give us from Steno's own words a window on how Steno reasoned and gave birth to this new science of geology. As for the outer rows, there was no question: The sharp, serrated blades were admirably designed for grasping the shark's prey and slicing it to pieces." (page 56)Cutler points out that Steno was not the first to notice the resemblance of these sharks teeth to Glossopetrae or Tongue Stones.
As Steno wrote, "from that which is perceived a definite conclusion may be drawn about what is imperceptible." From the present world one can deduce vanished worlds. As he himself pointed out, writers more than a thousand years earlier had said essentially the same thing. By the grand duke's order it was butchered, the body and entrails cast back into the sea, and the head sent on its way to Florence, where Steno waited." (page 54)" What particularly interested Steno, however, were the teeth. Steno recorded no dimensions, but those of a shark the size of Steno's would likely have blades up to three inches high.
This book is a real contribution to the history of science during an episode when the word science is just barely beginning to be used in our modern sense. For several years, relations within the group had been deteriorating. "According to Johannes Rose's inventory, Steno's clothing and personal furnishings consisted of 'a wretched black garment, an old tunic, his old cloak, two sack cloth shirts, some small warn handkerchiefs which he also wore as cravats, and a night cap.' The funeral was delayed for nearly two weeks for lack of proper clothing to dress the corpse."Post DeathCutler devotes a substantial portion of this book to the history or relevant science between Steno's death and the influence of James Hutton. Vastly older than the human species, the world could no longer be claimed as our exclusive domain." (Page 7)Cutler brings into the context precursor, contemporary, and successive scientists.
There were too many explanations." (page 62)Continuing on, Cutler describes how Steno the anatomist proceeds from dissecting a giant shark to recognizing and defining a geologic problem, and in so doing inventing our modern sciences of paleontology and geology.Geologic travel and field workOn his way to Florence, Steno traveled through the south of France, then through the Alps and Apennines over a period of six months with many stops and side trips. Much of the problem could be traced to the brilliant but quarrelsome Giovanni Alfonso Borelli. After erroneous ideas were discarded he said, what remained would be certain." page 90"Cartesian anatomy was a product not so much of observation as of reason." (page 87)"The keystone of Cartesian anatomy was the theory of the heart. Medici money paid for the art of Michelangelo and Botticelli, it underwrote Marsilio Ficino's translation of Plato.
Because the author methodically and clearly explains the prevailing beliefs that Steno had to overcome to formulate his Laws, which are fundamental (bedrock). This is a physically small book (8 x 5 inches) and not very long. In the history of geology, there is probably no better book (that is, easy read) to understand how and when and what it took to start geology on its way to becoming a science. to geology. By page 100 we have Steno's Laws and around page 160 Steno dies. So why read it.
Though geology is not especially glamorous, especially nowadays when the earth's vast age is no longer scientifically novel, I recommend this book to anyone interested in the breadth of the scientific endeavor. During his career Steno established a core of principles that have driven the field of geology ever since.In Steno's work, the book shows what goes on during the birth of a science -- or, the birth of science. Even persons whose interests don't really extend to geology will have much to appreciate in the essentially scientific story of Steno turning from folk knowledge to empirical, logical science. This book successfully achieves a rare combination of the two ingredients most non-technical science books attempt to unite: 1) compelling elements of human narrative and 2) clearly and accurately delivered science.The book focuses on a man who went by the name of Steno (among others). Steno noticed that much received knowledge in his life turned out to be empirically false, and so he dedicated himself to rebuilding factual knowledge of nature from the ground up.
But this book is more than a biography of Nicholaus Steno: it is a magnificent tapestry depicting the interplay of faith (or atheism) with the scientific data known at the time and the personalities of those with competing theories to explain a simple phenomenon. Alan Cutler has done an admirable job bringing to life the debates, questions, and controversies that faced the scientists of the seventeenth century.
We now know it as geology. This incredibly readable book is indeed the story of the birth of a science.
This book details the life and times of a brilliant Danish anatomist, turned geologist, turned priest, bishop, then saint. It is difficult to imagine today why and how this simple fact generated a debate spanning some 150 years and how Steno's simple but elegant explanation was all but lost for many of them.
If you are at all interested in this topic you will love this book. His contemporaries were the likes of Sir Isaac Newton, Robert Hooke, the philosophers Leibniz, Spinoza and Voltaire.
Why are seashells found on the tops of mountains.
His brilliant lectures demolished Decartes' theories on the brain, and paved the way for new understandings of anatomy. He eventually came to the conclusion that the seashell fossils inside the mountains were the result of the ocean once covering entire areas, and that sediments, in which fossils were trapped, layered on top of each other. Nicholaus Steno did too, and through his inquiry and investigation, discovered the geologic concept of "deep time"- discovering the age of the earth by examining the sedimentary layers.
At the time, most people thought that fossils literally grew inside rocks, through "plastic forces of nature." (The scientific world had not yet outgrown Aristotle's physics). Steno's discovery made Bishop Ussher's creation date of 4004 BC untenable, since it would have taken the seas far longer to recede than Noah's flood was supposed to have lasted. Steno argued that the fossils could not possibly grow inside rocks, because they weren't distorted the way that objects that actually did grow inside rocks were.
Ever wonder why there are seashells in rocks or in buildings made out of rocks. The "tongue stones" in the shark's mouth looked remarkably similar to the ones that he had seen in rocks. This book is highly recommended for anyone who is interested in the history of scientific discovery, and how someone's curiosity can change the way people think about the world.
Steno was a Danish scientist who originally went into anatomy. His interest in fossils was sparked by a shark's head that he was using for one of his lectures.
|
